If you listen to talk radio, you’ve heard the pitch: one supplement, a hundred and fifty nutrients, everything your body needs. Immuno 150 has been a direct-response fixture for years, and its core claim is a number — the biggest ingredient count on the shelf.
Our methodology doesn’t score counts; it scores amounts. So this review does the one thing the ads never do: it divides. Here’s what 150 ingredients look like when you ask how much of each you actually get.
At a glance
Quick verdict
Immuno 150 is the purest example we’ve scored of count-as-marketing. To fit 150 ingredients into five capsules, most of them must be present at doses that round to nothing: the herbal complex — turmeric, flaxseed and fifteen others — totals about 31 mg combined, which independent analysis puts thousands of times below studied doses. Meanwhile the vitamins swing the other way, with B12 at 250 times the Daily Value and vitamin E at four times, in a product marketed to older adults who may already take medications.
37/100 reflects both directions of that imbalance, plus a testing column that offers dietary marks and a facility inspection where a named standard should be. Credit where due: the amounts are printed, which is more than some famous rivals manage — it’s the amounts themselves that don’t hold up.
A consistent summary of formula, transparency, value and experience. Not a medical rating.
Scores follow our published 100-point methodology, applied identically to every product. View the scoring methodology.
May suit you if
- You want one bottle instead of several and accept trace-level herbs as garnish, not medicine
- A disclosed (if extreme) label beats the proprietary blends some rivals hide behind
- The radio brand’s longevity and guarantee give you comfort a startup wouldn’t
Skip it if
- You expect the 150 ingredients to be functional — most are present at doses that round to zero
- Mega-dose vitamins concern you or your doctor — B12 at 25,000% DV and E at 402% DV should be a conversation, not a default
- You want a named testing standard or published COAs — there are none
Plain Google search link — not an affiliate link. The Ingredient Report earns nothing if you purchase this product.
Key findings
Product specifications
| Format | Capsules — 150 per bottle, 5 per day (30 days) |
|---|---|
| Price (checked July 17, 2026) | $69.95 · $59.45 first-time · $55.96 subscription · multi-bottle to $51.76 |
| Cost per day | $2.33 ($1.87 sub) |
| Pitch | “70 plant-derived colloidal minerals plus 80+ whole-food nutrients” — 150+ ingredients |
| Herbal complex | ~31 mg total across 17 herbs (~2 mg each) |
| Flagged doses | B12 600 mcg (25,000% DV) · vitamin E 60.3 mg (402% DV) · copper 111% DV |
| Notable inactive ingredient | Titanium dioxide (banned as an EU food additive) |
| Marks shown | Vegan · non-GMO · gluten-free · kosher · made in USA · “FDA-inspected” facility |
| Independent testing certification | None named; no COAs published |
| Guarantee | 30-day money-back (first-time, single bottle) |
| Company | Exceptional Health Products, a division of Liquid Assets, Inc. — Broken Arrow, Oklahoma |
The formula: division is the review
Five capsules hold roughly four grams of material. Subtract the quantified vitamins and minerals and the amino acids, and what remains for everything else — the “9 exotic fruits,” the “17 antioxidants,” the seventeen herbs — is a rounding error per ingredient. That’s not an accusation; it’s the label’s own math, and it’s why our formula score is 8/25 despite genuine disclosure: an honest label can still describe a formula built for the ad read rather than the body.
The “70 plant-derived colloidal minerals” deserve their own sentence: beyond the handful of minerals humans are known to need (all separately quantified here), the remaining dozens are unnamed trace elements from humic/plant deposits — a category that has drawn purity and necessity questions from independent reviewers for decades, and for which no health benefit is established. Counting them toward “150 nutrients” is the whole marketing trick in miniature. Dosage & transparency: 9/20 — amounts printed (credit), extremes and trace-dusting scored against it.
The testing column
What’s shown: vegan, non-GMO, gluten-free and kosher marks — dietary-preference certifications that say nothing about potency or purity — plus “made in a FDA-inspected facility,” which is the legal baseline for every supplement sold in America, not a distinction. What’s absent: any named independent standard (NSF, USP, Informed Choice), any published certificate of analysis, any heavy-metal data — a notable silence for a product whose signature ingredient class is mined mineral deposits. 4/20. Standing offer: publish current batch COAs, heavy metals included, and we re-score on the record.
What it’s like to take
We have not yet purchased this product; this section reports themes, not our hands-on findings. Five capsules daily is among the heavier pill burdens in our coverage, and reported feedback splits along familiar direct-response lines: loyal long-term users (many recruited by radio hosts they trust) who report feeling better, and critical reviews focused on price, autoship friction and the gap between the ads and the label. Experience: 6/10 pending a hands-on trial.
The math
$69.95 for thirty days is $2.33 a day — about $850 a year at list price ($1.87/day on subscription). A quantified, well-formed multivitamin from major brands runs $0.20–$0.80 a day; the premium here buys the parts of the label that don’t survive division. Value: 5/15.
What customers report
We read customer feedback across the major platforms and summarize the recurring themes. We don’t republish other platforms’ reviews — check the live sources yourself:
Trustpilot & retail reviews
Polarized loyal vs. critical
Long-term believers on one side; billing, autoship and “didn’t notice anything” complaints on the other.
View live reviews →Better Business Bureau
Complaints on file
Filed complaints against Exceptional Health Products center on orders and refunds.
Read the BBB file →Independent analysts
Broadly negative
Dietitian and lab-adjacent reviewers converge on the same findings this review scores: trace herbs, mega vitamins, no testing standard.
Search independent reviews →We don't fact-check or verify individual customer reviews — reviewers' opinions and experiences are their own, and we never treat them as evidence that a product works or doesn't. We read feedback at scale, report recurring themes, and link the live sources.
Every factual claim on this page that is ours carries a checked date and a source. Spot an error? Tell us — corrections run under our corrections policy.
Reader reports · 0 so far
Share your experienceRight of reply: Exceptional Health Products is welcome to respond to this report on the record — including with batch COAs, which would trigger a re-score. Contact our editorial team — responses are published unedited alongside this review.
What to buy instead
If “everything in one bottle” is the appeal, know that the honest version of that product doesn’t exist at meaningful doses — physics wins. A quality multivitamin covers the quantified half of this label for a fraction of the price; for the whole-food half, our produce-supplement comparison scores the options that disclose their amounts.
Final assessment
Immuno 150 isn’t a scam; it’s something subtler — a formula engineered for its advertisement. The count is real, the amounts are printed, and the arithmetic those amounts describe is a product where most ingredients exist to be counted, a few exist at doses that warrant a doctor’s opinion, and none carry an independent test. 37/100: significant concerns — the second-lowest score we’ve published, above only a product that discloses nothing at all. If the one-bottle idea appeals, buy the quantified version of it from a brand with a named standard, and spend the difference on groceries. As always with high-dose vitamins: talk to your doctor first, especially about B12, E and copper if you take medications.
Frequently asked questions
Does it really have 150 nutrients?
The label lists 150+, anchored by 70 colloidal minerals. Counting isn’t dosing: seventeen herbs share ~31 mg, and most list entries are present at trace levels.
How much does it cost?
Checked July 17, 2026: $69.95/30 days ($2.33/day); $59.45 first-time; $55.96 subscription; multi-bottle tiers to $51.76.
Is it safe?
B12 runs 25,000% DV, vitamin E 402% DV, copper >100%, and titanium dioxide appears in the inactives. That’s a doctor conversation, not a default — especially for older adults on medications.
Is it third-party tested?
No named standard and no published COAs as of July 17, 2026 — dietary marks and an “FDA-inspected” facility only. We re-score if that changes.
The Label Brief — free weekly report
The biggest number on the shelf just met long division. Want next week’s math first?
Every week we put one supplement label, one price claim and one viral promise under the same microscope. One five-minute email. No hype, no sponsored scores.
Get The Label Brief free →How we scored this product
Every product is scored with the same public 100-point methodology: formula and ingredient quality (25%), dosage and label transparency (20%), testing and manufacturing transparency (20%), value (15%), product experience (10%) and brand and customer experience (10%). Commercial relationships never add points. Read the full methodology.
Sources
- Immuno 150 — immuno150.com product pages ($69.95/150 capsules; $59.45 first-time; $55.96 subscription; multi-bottle tiers; 5 capsules/day; “70 plant-derived colloidal minerals plus 80+ whole-food nutrients”; marks and facility claims; 30-day guarantee; Exceptional Health Products, division of Liquid Assets, Inc., Broken Arrow, OK). Checked July 17, 2026.
- Illuminate Labs — Immuno 150 analysis (herbal complex ~31 mg total/~2 mg per herb; vitamin E 60.3 mg/402% DV with mortality-research caution; B12 600 mcg/25,000% DV; copper 111% DV; titanium dioxide EU food-additive ban). Accessed July 17, 2026. illuminatelabs.org
- Trustpilot — immuno150.com review page (feedback themes; linked live, not republished). Accessed July 17, 2026.
- Better Business Bureau — Exceptional Health Products profile and complaints. Accessed July 17, 2026.
- The Ingredient Report — fruit & vegetable category comparison and Earth Energy Fruits & Veggies review (64/100).
Update history
- July 17, 2026 — Report first published from product-page facts and independent analyses checked this date. We have not yet purchased this product; label figures above are as reported by the sources cited, and a hands-on purchase (with label photography) is planned. Standing re-score offer: published batch COAs or a named independent certification.
Content is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Individual needs vary — consult your healthcare provider. Medical disclaimer.